Welcome To The European Guardian - The Home Of Europe's New Right

German Ethics Council calls for end of prohibition to sibling incest

germany incest

Germany’s national Ethics Council calls on the governing Christian Democrat Party to legalise incest between siblings, claiming that the benefits outweigh the consequences.

The reasoning behind this recommendation to Angela Merkel’s governing party suggests a conscious pursuit of the destruction of traditional Western values. The Ethics Council provides several justifications, all of which represent a vicious social marxist bias.

The debate over the legalisation of sibling incest was reignited following an incident in which a couple with four children discovered that they were in fact siblings, separated from each other at birth. Patrick Stuebing and Susan Karolewski have four children, two of whom are disabled. When their siblinghood was discovered, Patrick was imprisoned, and three of their children taken away, one being left with Susan. The Independent is quick to jump to the couple’s defense, saying “Two are disabled, although it is not known whether incest is the cause.” However, it is nearly universally known that incest creates an exorbitant possibility of genetic damage among offspring. Any other cause of disability among offspring is negligible compared to the dangers of incest. The Council, however, disregards this despite not having any experience in biology to back up their rejection.

The Council promotes the importance of ‘sexual self determination’, or the belief that a consenting adult should not be stopped from making his or her own decision as to with whom to enter a sexual relationship. The Council also refers to traditional Western family values as ‘ambiguous’, stating that the importance of individual freedom takes higher priority in law over an ‘ambiguous’ idea of important cultural values. Monogamy, enforced by heterosexual marriage, is the foundation upon which Western Civilisation’s reproduction functions, and is of course a steadfast system not in any way ambiguous.

However, the underlying argument for this recommendation is the freedom of allowing people to do what they want. The Council offers sympathy to members of incestual couples who have been imprisoned.

The Council has stated, via Independent:

“Incest between siblings appears to be very rare in Western societies according to the available data but those affected describe how difficult their situation is in light of the threat of punishment.

“They feel their fundamental freedoms have been violated and are forced into secrecy or to deny their love.

“The Ethics Council has been told of cases where half-siblings did not grow up together and have only met in their adult lives.”

The recommendation only covers sexual intercourse between siblings, while leaving out sexual intercourse between parent and child. This double standard is surely discriminatory; Oedipus was in a passionate, loving relationship with his mother, why should that love be banned? It should, because despite this being a slippery slope argument, it is very clear that this ongoing social ‘progress’ will nonetheless continue, and this call to legalise sibling incest will function as a stepping stone to more ominous moves in the future.

Jesse Bering is the author of the book “Perv: The Sexual Deviant In All Of Us”. He has called the legalisation of sibling incest “moral progress”, while also simultaneously discussing the social taboo of incest. According to Bering, this social taboo is normal, inadvertently acknowledging that the act is wrong, however he suggests that there is something exciting about incest, “it’s a carnival-esque affair”. Bering’s attitude on the subject is utterly despicable as he knowingly promotes degeneracy.

Luckily, there is also resistance to this push from the German government. Despite Angela Merkel’s party welcoming one degeneracy after another into German society, it is a relief that the party has at least one respectable value.

Party official Elisabeth Winkelmeier-Becker says, via Parhlo:

"The abolition of the offense of incest between siblings would be the wrong signal. Eliminating the threat of punishment against incestuous acts within families would run counter to the protection of undisturbed development for children,"

Of course, children are the primary purpose for sexual intercourse. Every party involved knows clearly that this degradation of sexual standards will ruin the genetic integrity of the next generations. Incest is seen as a social taboo because of evolutionary instinct, because of how destructive the act is. For the health of Western Civilisation and its People, incest must remain criminal.

Source: Parhlo, Independent

About the Author

Frederique Pierce

Editor-in-Chief

A Canadian engineering student, and one who passionately believes in a Eurocentric world. Europe, my colonial father, has provided me with my values, my science, my language, and my culture, and for that, I embrace and thank them.

Add comment
  • No comments found